Warren v. Warren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although our Courts have not specifically defined what constitutes a joint benefit in the context of marital debt, this Court has never required that the marital unit actually benefited from the debt incurred.”
• “Although our Courts have not specifically defined what constitutes a joint benefit in the context of marital debt, this Court has never required that the marital unit actually benefited from the debt incurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Drayton v. Drayton
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-08-30· cited 9×
• Purvis v. Purvis
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-16
• Sapia v. Sapia
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-06-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Speirs
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-10-16· cited 348×
• McConathy v. McConathy
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-02-23· cited 37×
• Hicks v. Hicks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-06-02· cited 11×