Skip to main content

Warren v. State

Citations

  • 768 S.W.2d 300
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
  • 1989 WL 24587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, after sua sponte dismissal of prospective juror, any error is waived in absence of objection
  • stating that, to preserve complaint and establish harm, defendant must (1) object to sua sponte excusal of juror; (2) at conclusion of voir dire, claim he is to be tried to jury to which he has legitimate objection; (3) specifically identify juror or jurors he is complaining about; and (4
  • “It is well settled that a trial judge should not on his own motion excuse a prospective juror for cause unless the juror is absolutely disqualified from serving on the jury.”
  • \It is well settled that a trial judge should not on his own motion excuse a prospective juror for cause unless the juror is absolutely t disqualified from serving on the jury.\
  • \It is well settled that a trial judge should not i on his own motion excuse a prospective juror for cause unless the juror is absolutely disqualified from serving on the jury.\
  • extending Green to non-capital cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Clinton, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.