· 7/1/1877
Warren v. St. Paul
Citations
- 29 F. Cas. 282
- 5 Dill. 498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A Banks analysis was unnecessary, however, because the issue here is purely a matter of statutory interpretation, not common law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.