Skip to main content
· 7/1/1877

Warren v. St. Paul

Citations

  • 29 F. Cas. 282
  • 5 Dill. 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A Banks analysis was unnecessary, however, because the issue here is purely a matter of statutory interpretation, not common law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.