Warren v. Prejean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating further that “parsing of the legislative findings with regard to Title VII [retaliation claims] is unnecessary”
• affirming the exclusion of testimony about information that was not previously available to the employer and was therefore ‘irrelevant as to the information known to [the employer] at the time of the termination’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).