Warren v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no due process violation occasioned by the prosecu- tor’s attempt to violate Doyle on closely analogous facts
• holding that there was no due process violation occasioned by the prosecu- tor’s attempt to violate Doyle on closely analogous facts
• holding that there was no due process violation occasioned by the prosecutor’s attempt to violate Doyle on closely analogous facts
• recognizing that curative instructions will generally cure error except in rare circumstances
• noting that the district court has \broad discretion\ when evaluating the admissibility of 404(b) evidence
• finding that cross-examination question on defendant's post-Miranda silence was harmless where court explicitly sustained an objection and gave curative instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).