Warren v. Guilford County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if the effect of the Cease and Desist Order was to deny plaintiff all economically viable use of its property, it would be entitled to compensation notwithstanding inquiry into the other two factors outlined in Penn Central
• rejecting temporary takings claim where landowner had “substantial economically beneficial use” of property during period of alleged temporary taking
• rejecting plaintiffs temporary takings claim where plaintiff was unable to demonstrate “extraordinary delay” by the government
• granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Fifth Amendment taking ease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).