Warren v. Georgia Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that photographer’s presentation “for profit” of photograph was insufficient basis for Sections 50 and 51 claims where subject matter of photograph and accompanying article were within “the area of legitimate public interest”
• publication of photographs of plaintiffs' deceased children not actionable as trespass since claim was really based on interference with rights of a personal nature rather than for interference with rights to exclusive possession of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).