Warren R. Erhardt v. Prudential Group, Inc. And Prudential Ventures Corporation, Nathan M. Shippee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that communications that are “factually or legally incomplete, lack objectivity and neutrality, or contain untruths will surely result in confusion and adversely affect the administration of justice”
• explaining that notice to class members is “crucial” to Rule 23 and discussing the Court’s responsibility in preventing abusive practices
• “I was not forced to work by United Staffing. Neither was I not paid properly.”
• “Unapproved notices to class members which are factually or legal incomplete, lack objectivity and neutrality, or contain untruths will surely result in confusion and adversely affect the administration of justice.”
• “I do not want to be a part of this case because I willingly signed the contract and I understood the terms of the contract. Nobody forced me to work for United Staffing.”
• “I signed my contract voluntarily. United Staffing did not force me to work and to continue to work. The contract was clear. I agreed to work for at least three years. Besides, I was paid correctly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).