Skip to main content
· 4/20/2016

Warren Lee Edwards v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting “the Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order,” and appearing to apply an abuse of discretion standard by referring to the duty of deciding whether nondisclosed expert witness opinions should be excluded as “discretionary”
  • interpreting “the Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order,” and appearing to apply an abuse of discretion standard by referring to the duty of deciding whether nondisclosed expert witness opinions should be excluded as “discretionary”
  • interpreting “the Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order,” and appearing to apply an abuse of discretion standard by referring to the duty of deciding whether nondisclosed expert witness opinions should be excluded as “discretionary”
  • absent a “legitimate reason” justifying the failure to disclose an expert opinion before trial, the trial court erred by admitting the previously undesignated opinion at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.