Warren L. Anderson and Ruby Anderson v. Deere & Co., John Deere Co., and John Deere Industrial Equipment Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court’s erroneous ruling on the timeliness of a Rule 59(e) motion was harmless error
• concluding that earlier interlocutory orders dismissing certain defendants \merged\ with judgment dismissing last defendant for purposes of finality
• holding that Rule 59’s time limits do not begin to run until a final judgment is entered
• concluding that the district court's erroneous ruling on the timeliness of a Rule 59(e) motion was harmless error
• “It is within the District Judge’s discretion to revise [her] interlocutory orders prior to entry of final judgment.”
• “It is within the District Judge’s discretion to revise his interlocutory orders prior to entry of final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).