Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that candidates who both lacked qualifications for a position were “similarly situated for the purposes of reviewing [the plaintiff’s] claim”
• noting that employee must provide specific evidence to prove that an employer’s reason for adverse employment action was not factually based or was not the real reason for the decision
• comparing the qualifications of the plaintiff and the person who was selected for the position in a failure to promote case in determining that plaintiff had met her prima facie burden
• finding no prima facie case for failure to promote to quality engineer because plaintiff lacked objective qualifications such as a college degree
• comparing the qualifications of the plaintiff and the person who was selected for the position in a failure to promote case in determining that plaintiff had met her pri-ma facie burden
• comparing the qualifications of the plaintiff and the person who was selected for the position in a failure to promote case in determining that plaintiff had met her prima facie burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).