Warren E. Hanvey v. W. D. Blankenship, H. E. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a complete confiscation and disposal of property not denial of due process because state statute gave prison officials discretion to dispose of property seized for violation of rules regulating property possession
• prison officials do not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights when they seize contraband
• prison officials do not violate inmate's Constitutional rights when they seize contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William F. Washlefske v. Andrew J. Winston Ronald J. Angelone
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 57×
• Bryant v. Barbara
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1986-04-17· cited 18×
• Savko v. Rollins
  D. Maryland· 1990-08-07· cited 10×
• Webb v. Lane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-13· cited 7×
• Washlefske v. Winston
  E.D. Virginia· 1999-08-13· cited 7×
• Demmerick Brown v. Karen Stapleton
  Fourth Circuit· 2025-07-01· cited 4×
• Blackmon v. Norris
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1989-05-03· cited 3×
• Washlefske v. Winston
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-12-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dennis Sell and Edward Konder v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex
  Eighth Circuit· 1977-02-02· cited 31×
• Hanvey v. Blankenship
  W.D. Virginia· 1979-08-20· cited 8×