· 1/26/1994
Warner v. Motor Vehicles Division
Citations
- 126 Or. App. 164
- 868 P.2d 6
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the omitted junior lienholder had the right to a sale of the property subject to the prior mortgage
- recognizing that the omitted junior lienholder had the right to a sale of the property subject to the prior mortgage
- holding that a junior judgment creditor stands on “essentially the same ground” as a junior mortgagee in that his rights are “in no way affected by the foreclosure of a senior mortgage, where the junior mortgagee was not made a party to the proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leeson, Muniz, Rossman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.