Skip to main content
· 1/26/1994

Warner v. Motor Vehicles Division

Citations

  • 126 Or. App. 164
  • 868 P.2d 6
  • 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the omitted junior lienholder had the right to a sale of the property subject to the prior mortgage
  • recognizing that the omitted junior lienholder had the right to a sale of the property subject to the prior mortgage
  • holding that a junior judgment creditor stands on “essentially the same ground” as a junior mortgagee in that his rights are “in no way affected by the foreclosure of a senior mortgage, where the junior mortgagee was not made a party to the proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leeson, Muniz, Rossman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.