Skip to main content
· 12/13/1996

Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance Companies

Citations

  • 688 A.2d 177
  • 455 Pa. Super. 295
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing exception to general rule that disputes arising under contract with valid arbitration clause are referred to arbitrator
  • noting that “[i]n light of the prior case law which the legislature was well aware of when it enacted [the repeals], we are unable to conclude that the legislature intended that the [exclusivity] provisions of the WCA would preclude recovery”
  • compensation carrier had right of subrogation for workers’ compensation benefits paid where insured worker received uninsured motorist benefits from employer’s policy
  • “[Cláimant] instituted suit against the driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident and settled the action prior to trial for ... a sum which represented the tort-feasor’s policy limits.. ..”
  • the scope of review in an appeal following a sentence imposed after probation revocation is limited to the validity of the revocation proceedings and the legality of the judgment of sentence
  • the scope of review in an appeal following a sentence imposed after probation revocation is limited to the validity of the revocation proceedings and the legality of the judgment of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Eakin, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.