Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants’ false statements about plaintiff that were “made with the intent to destroy his reputation in the community” were not outrageous and intolerable
• denying motion to dismiss worker’s compensation retaliation claim despite the presence of ERISA retaliation and wrongful discharge claims in the complaint because Rule 8(e) permits alternative pleading
• compiling cases and holding that “unspecified future business endeavor” is not sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).