Skip to main content
· 5/24/1990

Warner Lambert Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 575 A.2d 956
  • 133 Pa. Commw. 250
  • 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employer's subrogation interest does not include a loss of consortium claim when there was no jury verdict attributed to the amount of recovery
  • because there was no jury verdict and no ruling attributing the amount of recovery to a loss of consortium claim, the total recovery is subject to the employer’s subrogation interest
  • entire third-party settlement, which consisted of payment of a single lump sum, subject to subrogation because “no jury verdict or other cognizable ruling ... fixing the amounts payable [to claimant and her husband, if any]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Pellegrini, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.