Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Arizona catchall provision does not create liability for aiding and abetting
• holding that the Arizona catchall provision does not create liability for aiding and abetting
• holding that the Arizona catchall provision does not create liability for aiding and abetting
• stating that successor liability also exists if the successor expressly agreed to assume the predecessor’s liabilities or if the alleged transactions between the two companies amounted to a consolidation or merger
• permitting successor liability to lie against a corporation constituting a “mere continuation” of a predecessor
• companies had similar names, services provided, customers, and business partners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).