Skip to main content
· 2/2/2024

Warman v. Select Auto

Citations

  • 235 N.E.3d 550
  • 2024 Ohio 366

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant-car dealership's motion to set aside the default judgment on liability and to file its answer out of time. In calculating the amount of appellee-car buyer's damages, the trial court reasonably used a subsequent appraisal value, as offered by appellee, as the actual value at the time of the sale. However, the trial court erred in its calculation of actual damages by using the total cost of the vehicle, including finance charges and other costs, as the vehicle's represented value. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for recalculation of actual and treble/punitive damages.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.