Skip to main content
· 5/17/1910

Wark v. Moore

Citations

  • 179 F. 873
  • 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5437

Syllabus

<p>Contracts (§ 240*) — Building Materials — Persons Iaable.</p> <p>Where plaintiff became a subcontractor to furnish part of the labor and materials for the construction of a building, under a construction company with whicli defendant bad no individual connection, and the only proof of defendant’s substitution for the construction company was an alleged agreement by defendant’s partner, who was without authority to act except for the interests of the firm, which had nothing to do with the construction of the building, defendant was not liable on plaintiff’s contract.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Contracts, Cent. Dig. § 1125; Dec. Dig. § 240.*]</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • both of which discuss concerns as to the reliability of the cost approach when used to value older buildings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McPherson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.