Wargo v. State Universities Retirement System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the rights of entities not made a party to the foreclosure proceedings were not cut off
• “That the driveway in question was an apparent and visible easement belonging to the property conveyed to the plaintiff’s grantor does not admit of doubt, and, if it is reasonably necessary for the use of his property, he is entitled to its continuance.”
• “That the driveway in question was an apparent and visible easement belonging to the property conveyed to the plaintiff’s grantor does not admit of doubt, and, if it is reasonably necessary for the use of his property, he is entitled to its continuance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).