Ware v. The City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the city did not owe the plaintiffs an individual duty to protect them from a porch collapse
• “[section 2-202] explicitly addresses public employees, not -24- 1-07-3085 government entities such as the City” (emphasis in original)
• no duty to prevent injury from porch collapse on private property
• no duty to prevent injury from porch collapse on private property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).