Skip to main content

Ware v. State

Citations

  • 736 S.W.2d 700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to law of the case doctrine because identical issue in present case was resolved in prior case
  • refusing to review for the second time the evidence offered at a suppression hearing
  • deferring to “law of the case” where an issue has previously been resolved
  • “The ‘law of the case’ doctrine is as applicable to the appeals of criminal cases as it is to appeals of civil cases.”
  • “The ‘law of the case’ doctrine is as applicable to the appeals of criminal cases as it is to appeals of civil cases.”
  • “[W]hen the facts and legal issues in a case on appeal are virtually identical with those in a previous appeal in which the legal issues were resolved[,] then logic and reason dictate that the appeals be viewed as the same case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.