Ware v. Gulda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a person “cannot place his property in trust for his own benefit and keep it beyond the reach of his creditors”
• finding one cannot place property in trust for his own benefit and keep it beyond the reach of creditors
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 156(2) (1959)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).