Skip to main content
· 11/1/2022

Ware v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employee’s comment that he “might” need leave after the birth of his child was not sufficient notice that he needed FMLA leave
  • concluding that one month between was sufficiently close
  • affirming dismissal of FMLA retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he engaged in protected activity by providing notice of intent to take FMLA leave
  • based on distinct statutory texts, holding that motivating factor test does not apply to FMLA, while Title VII explicitly authorizes such an approach in Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Trevor N. McFadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.