Ware, J., Pet v. Trus. of the Univ. of PA (WCAB)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an employer's letter of recommendation did not prove discrimi- nation because it failed to respond to the precise reason for the plain- tiff's termination
• acknowledging that employee versatility is a legitimate reason for taking adverse employment action
• affirming district court’s decision granting defendant judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of pretext to sustain jury verdict of age discrimination
• plaintiff must do more that restate prima facie case to sustain burden of establishing pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).