Ward's heirs v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The Court finds that this is not a case in which Plaintiffs can rely on a common job description as evidence that a collective action [is] appropriate. A job title alone is insufficient to establish the exempt status of an employee.\
• “[M]erely classifying a group of employees as exempt does not automatically qualify them as similarly situated, nor eliminate the need to make a factual determination as to whether class members are actually performing similar duties.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).