Wardle v. Cummings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where policy provided coverage only for injuries “caused by accident,” no coverage where insured intentionally drove into another car
• interpreting accident coverage to imply an “intentional act” exclusion
• interpreting accident coverage to imply an \intentional act\ exclusion
• “an unexpected happening without intention or design”
• \an unexpected happening without intention or design\
• “an unexpected happening without intention or design”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).