Skip to main content
· 11/24/1965

Ward v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Citations

  • 153 Conn. 141
  • 215 A.2d 104
  • 1965 Conn. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • variance inappropriate where “the rationale behind the granting of a variance for one piece of property would apply in like manner to the surrounding properties”
  • ‘‘[e]vidence of financial considerations, short of a drastic deprecia- tion in the value of the property, will not suffice [to show hardship]’’
  • “[t]he hardship requirement is a fundamental one in zoning law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Murphy, Shannon, House, Cotter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.