Ward v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘a substantial increase in the husband’s salary does not present a substantial change in circumstances to justify an upward modification of alimony’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brescia v. Fitts
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-05-20· cited 407×
• Rough v. Kandell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-12-21· cited 250×
• La Blanc v. La Blanc
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-21· cited 14×
• Gallousis v. Gallousis
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-03-03· cited 11×
• Hickman v. Hickman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-04-07· cited 4×
• King v. King
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-07-05· cited 3×
• Jan S. v. Leonard S.
  New York Supreme Court· 2009-08-28· cited 2×
• Matter of Georgette D.W. v. Gary N.R.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-12-01· cited 1×
• Dan v. Dan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kay v. Kay
  New York Court of Appeals· 1975-10-30· cited 129×
• Kover v. Kover
  New York Court of Appeals· 1972-01-13· cited 93×
• Coen v. Coen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-03-24· cited 4×