Oregon Supreme Court· 2/28/1951
Ward v. TOWN TAVERN
Citations
- 228 P.2d 216
- 191 Or. 1
- 42 A.L.R. 2d 662
- 1951 Ore. LEXIS 186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The inference we draw is that ORS 20.096(1) is, as it is always called, a 11 reciprocity statute, and it should be broadly construed. . . . Thus, the scope of defendants’ attorney 12 fees in this case should mirror the scope of plaintiff’s fees, had it prevailed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lusk, Brand, Rossman, Hay, Latourette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-09-21· cited 54×
- State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-04-06· cited 53×
- Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court· 1956-05-31· cited 41×
- B. Kreisman & Co. v. First Arlington National BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-22· cited 36×
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. BristolOregon Supreme Court· 1951-10-24· cited 28×
- Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1963-07-31· cited 26×
- Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-10-21· cited 26×
- Powell v. SheetsOregon Supreme Court· 1952-12-03· cited 20×
- Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1977-02-25· cited 20×
- Fleming v. WinebergOregon Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 20×
- Harrington v. McCarthyIdaho Supreme Court· 1966-11-28· cited 19×
- Lemire v. McCollumOregon Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 18×
- Betz Construction, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-07-21· cited 14×
- Rexnord, Inc. v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 14×
- Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-31· cited 13×
- Nelson v. Hampton Et UxOregon Supreme Court· 1956-03-01· cited 13×
- B & D Investment Corp. v. PetticordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-22· cited 10×
- Oshatz v. GoltzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-14· cited 10×
- Gillman v. EmelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-12-30· cited 10×
- Hughes v. Heppner Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-04-29· cited 9×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court· 1895-04-08· cited 78×
- Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court· 1879-01-15· cited 39×
- R. Haas Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Springfield Amusement Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1908-10-26· cited 37×
- Kitcherside v. MyersOregon Supreme Court· 1881-10-15· cited 33×
- Municipal Security Co. v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1898-08-13· cited 27×
- Mogul Transportation Co. v. LarisonOregon Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 19×
- Ming Yue v. Coos Bay RailroadOregon Supreme Court· 1893-07-10· cited 18×
- McCann v. Oregon Scenic Trips Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-10-03· cited 17×
- Denny v. McCownOregon Supreme Court· 1898-10-31· cited 15×
- Cornelius v. Washington Steam LaundryWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-26· cited 13×
- Gillihan v. CielohaOregon Supreme Court· 1915-01-26· cited 13×
- Nessley v. LaddOregon Supreme Court· 1898-07-18· cited 12×
- J. B. Ehrsam & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-04-12· cited 8×
- Matthiesen v. AbataOregon Supreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 7×
- Multnomah County v. Portland Cracker Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1907-05-21· cited 7×
- McFeron v. DoyensOregon Supreme Court· 1911-06-22· cited 7×
- Drew v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-01-15· cited 7×
- Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court· 1950-10-24· cited 6×
- McAlear v. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1913-02-11· cited 4×
- Patterson v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court· 1894-01-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.