Skip to main content
· 10/15/1886

Ward v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

Citations

  • 91 Mo. 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that the PPF “may not cover all claims that arise” but noting that “other avenues of compensation will remain available to victims, including civil and criminal litigation” (emphasis added)
  • stating that “[t]he PPF is designed as a last resort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.