Ward v. Southern Pacific Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The track is the private property of the company and was not built to be used as a highway for pedestrians”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Palmer v. Oregon Short Line R.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1908-11-23· cited 31×
• Ewing v. Rhea
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1900-11-26· cited 21×
• Richardson v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-05-19· cited 8×
• Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Logsdon's Admr.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1904-06-20· cited 7×
• Rathbone v. Oregon Railroad
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1901-12-16· cited 6×
• Dotta v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1904-12-31· cited 5×
• Imler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1916-02-07· cited 5×
• Mills v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1896-04-15· cited 5×
• Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Potter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1902-01-11· cited 5×
• Boyer v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2015-09-25· cited 4×
• Stimson Lumber Company v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2023-10-02· cited 4×
• Hanks v. Great Northern Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-12-03· cited 2×
• Stimson Lumber Company v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2020-05-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. Sympkins
  Texas Supreme Court· 1881-03-29· cited 77×
• Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Graham
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-28· cited 52×
• Spicer v. Chesapeake & O. R'y Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1890-12-13· cited 38×
• Toomey v. Southern Pacific Railroad
  California Supreme Court· 1890-11-12· cited 28×
• Woodruff v. Northern Pac. R.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington· 1891-09-03· cited 7×
• Grethen v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota· 1884-12-15· cited 3×