Ward v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e decline the invitation to equate ‘fundamental fairness’ with a constitutional right to the appointment of assigned counsel for all indigent parents seeking visitation with their children”
• \[W]e decline the invitation to equate `fundamental fairness' with a constitutional right to the appointment of assigned counsel for all indigent parents seeking visitation with their children\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frase v. Barnhart
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-11· cited 37×
• Molinari v. Tuthill
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-02-24· cited 36×
• Matter of Ronald R. v. Natasha FF.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-06-15· cited 15×
• Reiss v. Giraldo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-10-12· cited 12×
• Edwards v. Cade
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-10-19· cited 8×
• Newton v. Simons
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-06-05· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
• People v. Ward
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-04-12· cited 22×
• McCrone v. Parker
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-28· cited 15×
• Trombley v. Trombley
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-01-23· cited 11×
• Szemansco v. Szemansco
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-07-11· cited 9×