· 11/24/2014
Ward v. Jewell
Citations
- 772 F.3d 1199
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22148
- 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,201
- 125 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 437
- 2014 WL 6610263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate causation in a situation where he argued that his employer should have demoted or fired the other employee and should have given the plaintiff his previous supervisory responsibilities
- observing that a prima facie case of retal- iation requires more than “speculation, conjecture, or surmise”
- observing that a prima facie case of retaliation requires more than “speculation, conjecture, or surmise”
- noting that speculation is insufficient to support a causal nexus
- evaluating the causal connection element in a plaintiffs prima facie case by the but-for standard
- affirming summary judgment against Title VII retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to present evidence that plaintiff’s participation in EEOC proceedings was the but-for cause of defendant’s adverse employment actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Bacharach, Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.