Skip to main content
· 11/24/2014

Ward v. Jewell

Citations

  • 772 F.3d 1199
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22148
  • 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,201
  • 125 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 437
  • 2014 WL 6610263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate causation in a situation where he argued that his employer should have demoted or fired the other employee and should have given the plaintiff his previous supervisory responsibilities
  • observing that a prima facie case of retal- iation requires more than “speculation, conjecture, or surmise”
  • observing that a prima facie case of retaliation requires more than “speculation, conjecture, or surmise”
  • noting that speculation is insufficient to support a causal nexus
  • evaluating the causal connection element in a plaintiffs prima facie case by the but-for standard
  • affirming summary judgment against Title VII retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to present evidence that plaintiff’s participation in EEOC proceedings was the but-for cause of defendant’s adverse employment actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Bacharach, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.