Ward v. Iowa Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pointing out agency decision’s failure to comply with statutory requirement of separately stating the facts and conclusions of law but considering the merits of the claim because “it is possible to work backward and to deduce what must have been his legal conclusions”
• for purposes of workers compensation, “[t]he incident or activity need not be the sole proximate cause, if the injury is directly traceable to it”
• agency finding binding on appeal unless contrary result demanded as matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).