Ward v. International Paper Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an inference of age discrimination could be established with evidence that a substantially younger worker replaced the plaintiff
• “[I]t is not the role of this court to sit as a ‘super-personnel department’ to second guess the wisdom of a business’s personnel decisions.”
• in a summary judgment action, the court held that the inference of unlawful discrimination can be satisfied “by producing evidence that a substantially younger worker replaced the plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).