Skip to main content
· 4/22/1985

Ward v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 699 P.2d 960
  • 1985 Colo. LEXIS 423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unemployment benefits claimant's due process rights were not violated \because the record discloses that he was not prejudiced by the notice or lack of bill of particulars to which he objects\
  • on remand, the commission must determine whether “the claimant’s evidence establishes that his expression was protected by the ‘whistleblower’ statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovira, Dubofsky, Kirshbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.