Ward v. Griggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The third, which involves application of Harlow’s objective test to that particular conduct at issue, may require factual determinations respecting disputed aspects of that conduct.”
• \[T]he most obvious possibility [of exceptional circumstances sup- porting qualified immunity despite the violation of a clearly estab- lished constitutional right] is mistaken official advice by legal counsel.\
• “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”
• “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”
• “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).