Ward v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could guess that defendant was the man at the bar in the redacted statement only because testimony of eye witnesses had placed him there

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Louis Moschiano and Robert Fred Bishop, in Re Stephen M. Komie
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-11-29· cited 85×
• State v. Burnett
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 20×
• United States v. Panetta
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-06-24· cited 19×
• United States v. Steven Elmer Roell and Carrie Lee Manning
  Eighth Circuit· 1973-11-12· cited 16×
• State v. Romero
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-30· cited 16×
• State v. Brocato
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-04-09· cited 13×
• United States v. Christos Stamas
  First Circuit· 1971-06-04· cited 9×
• State v. Wilson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 8×
• United States v. Solario
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-06-23· cited 6×
• Simien v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-18· cited 5×
• United States v. Gazzara
  S.D. New York· 1984-05-22· cited 5×
• United States v. Golon
  D. Massachusetts· 1974-07-30· cited 4×
• Caldrone v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-07-17· cited 2×
• Government of the V.I. v. Allick
  Virgin Islands· 2006-09-22· cited 2×
• United States v. Hern
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-09-08· cited 2×
• United States v. Smith
  E.D. Kentucky· 1993-02-12· cited 1×
• United States v. Ralph F. Dreitzler, Jr., United States of America v. Ralph F. Dreitzler, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-06-23

Other cases named Ward v. California

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Ward v. California
  Supreme Court· 1959-03-23· cited 4×
• Ward v. California
  Supreme Court· 2004-11-15
• Ward v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-11-17
• Ward v. California
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-10
• Ward v. California
  Supreme Court· 2019-10-07