Ward One Democrats, Inc. v. Woodland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “direct or circumstantial evidence,” such as “scientific surveys or polls of consumers,” is required to prove that an indistinct mark has acquired a secondary meaning
• “In the District of Columbia, as in most states, trademark statutes and the applicable case law are modeled after the federal Lanham Act.”
• discussing common law trademark infringement under District of Columbia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).