Ward Electronics Service, Inc. v. First Commercial Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that change in theory is insufficient basis for denying amendment absent prejudice, bad faith, futility, or dilatoriness associated with motion
• “a change in the theory of recovery” not cognizable as prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).