Ward Co. v. Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing area in which the Kansas enactment departed from the proposed UCCJEA
• discussing area in which the Kansas enactment departed from the proposed UCCJEA
• specific statute applicable rather than general statute; specific provision within statute applicable over more general provision within statute
• striking cross-reference that referred to no past or present statute
• “If a statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction and [Kansas courts] will neither speculate regarding legislative intent nor read the statute to add something not readily found in it.”
• “If a statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction and this court will neither speculate regarding legislative intent nor read the statute to add something not readily found in it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).