Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. v. Schrapper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “choice of law factor, while relevant to establishing hardship and inconvenience, primarily focuses on ‘Delaware’s interest in the litigation’” (quoting Ison, 729 A.2d at 843 (Del. 1999))
• Denying relief when movant “has not done anything more than claim inconvenience . . . based on little more than generalized references to the garden-variety concerns and expenses that characterize transnational litigation.”
• Denying relief when movant “has not done anything more than claim inconvenience . . . based on little more than generalized references to the garden-variety concerns and expenses that characterize transnational litigation.”
• “A motion to stay or dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).