Skip to main content
· 11/6/1882

Waples v. Hays

Citations

  • 108 U.S. 6
  • 1 S. Ct. 80
  • 27 L. Ed. 632
  • 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1272

Syllabus

<p>Confiscation — Mortgage—Subrogation.</p> <p>1. A mortgaged real estate in New Orleans to B. Proceedings being taken against it -under the Confiscation Acts as the property oí A, B intervened. The estate was condemned and sold to C, and the proceeds paid to B .under decree ol court. Alter the death oí A, suit was brought on behalf of his heirs to recover possession of the property : Held, that 0 acquired the Jife estate of A; that the heirs of A were entitled to recover; and that neither the United States nor C was subrogated to the rights of B; also,</p> <p>2. That under the practice of Louisiana, C could not, after going to trial on the petition, object that it was defective by reason of not setting forth the deed under which he claimed title.</p>

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.