Wapato Heritage, L.L.C. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying similar contract interpretation principals under federal law and holding the 12 separate notice provision which required “[n]otices and demands shall be served b[y] certified 13 mail, return receipt requested” applied to the option contract provision
• “[T]he BIA’s 7 obligations to act in furtherance of Native American interests does not mean that the 8 BIA per se assumes their contractual obligations when it acts on their behalf.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).