Wanzer v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If reasonable market rates [of attorney’s fees] are in dispute, a hearing must be conducted.
• district court did not abuse discretion by reducing lodestar by 25% where plaintiff succeeded on only two of ten claims
• “it would not have been unreasonable to expect [trial counsel] to conduct the trial... .with the help ofan associate”
• “it would not have been unreasonable to expect [trial counsel] to conduct the trial... .with the help ofan associate”
• “The market rate to be used [in calculating a lodestar hourly rate] is the current prevailing market rate at the time the request for fees is made.”
• “Where plaintiffs have prevailed on [New Jersey Law Against Discrimination] claims in federal court, we have approved of Rendine enhancements and required District Courts to consider their possible application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).