Skip to main content
· 3/1/2011

Wantz v. Afzal

Citations

  • 14 A.3d 1244
  • 197 Md. App. 675
  • 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is well-settled that ‘the determination by the trial court of the experiential qualifications of a witness will only be disturbed on appeal if there has been a clear showing of abuse of the trial court’s discretion.’” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James, Eyler, Woodward, Hotten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.