Wantland v. Maryland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “interrogatory subparts are to be counted as part of but one interrogatory for the purpose of [our local rule] if they are logically or factually subsumed within and necessarily related to the primary question.”
• “interrogatory subparts 10 are to be counted as part of but one interrogatory for the purposes of Local Rule 190, subd. 1(c) if 11 they are logically or factually subsumed within and necessarily related to the primary question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).