Want v. Leve

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “With the adoption of the Rule the question became one of whether that party had notice of the institution of the lawsuit prior to the time the limitations period had expired, so that he would not be prejudiced in maintaining his defense on the merits . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
  W.D. Missouri· 1979-11-13· cited 28×
• Kennon v. Citizens Mutual Insurance-Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-11-22· cited 22×
• Kilgore v. Kilgore
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-02-14· cited 19×
• Boone County v. County Employees' Retirement Fund
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-27· cited 15×
• Shroyer v. McCarthy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-03-21· cited 11×
• Abbate v. Tortolano
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-01-16· cited 11×
• Tretter v. Johns-Manville Corp.
  E.D. Missouri· 1980-11-17· cited 11×
• Tiffany Industries, Inc. v. Harbor Insurance
  W.D. Missouri· 1982-03-29· cited 9×
• Goodkin v. 8182 Maryland Associates Ltd. Partnership
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-07-09· cited 9×
• DePaul Community Health Center v. Trefts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-29· cited 7×
• Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Panco Forwarding, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-11-17· cited 6×
• Kayser Roth Co. v. Holmes
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-07-02· cited 5×
• Kingsley v. McDonald
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29· cited 5×
• Weinberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-07-26· cited 3×
• Mary Kingsley v. Richard McDonald
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2008-01-28