Wanless v. Wraight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parking lot did not qualify as a “public use” as defined by Brown.
• holding that parking lot did not fall qualify as a \public use\ as defined by Brown.
• holding pursuant to Brown that a public parking lot did not satisfy the definition of public use and the plaintiff could obtain title to a portion of the parking lot through adverse possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).